Chitralekha vs state of mysore
WebSUBBA RAO J.-These two appeals raise the question of the validity, of the orders made by the Government of Mysore in respect of admissions to Engineering and Medical Colleges in the State of Mysore.The facts may be briefly stated: in the State of Mysore there are a number of Engineering and Medical Colleges-most of them are Government Colleges …
Chitralekha vs state of mysore
Did you know?
WebBalaji V. State of Mysore and Chitralekha V. State of Mysore took a rigid stand in refusing to accept caste as a factor of backwardness, treating social backwardness as. a result of poverty, not recognising 'Class' and 'Caste* as synonymous, directing that ťOther Backward Classes' should be comparable to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled WebNov 29, 2024 · State of Mysore & Ors., 12 (Chitralekha), which upheld an order of the government that defined "backwardness" without any reference to caste using other …
WebView Complete document. R. Chitralekha & Anr vs State Of Mysore & Ors on 29 January, 1964. Showing the contexts in which mysoreappears in the document. Change context … WebIndian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law
WebIn B. Chitralekha v. State of Mysore; it was pointed out that the provisions of Article 166 of the Constitution were only directory and not mandatory and, if they were not complied with it could be established as a question of fact that the order was issued by the State Government. The learned Attorney General urged that the order, if any, was ... WebIn CHITRALEKHA v. STATE OF MYSORE AIR 1964 SC 1832, the Supreme Court considered the question and observed that caste cannot be the sole or dominant consideration in identifying the backwardness, though it may form one of the considerations. The ascertainment of the backwardness of a group of persons can also be made on the …
WebR. Chitralekha and Anr. v. State of Mysore & Ors. [1964] 6 S.C.R. 368, 382 referred to. JUDGMENT: CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION:Civil Appeals Nos. 1261-1264 of 1975. …
WebJun 12, 2024 · 22. Given below are two statements, one is labeled as Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R). Assertion (A) : Agra and Darjeeling are located on the same latitude but temperature of January in Agra is 16° Centigrade whereas it is only 4° Centigrade in Darjeeling. Reason (R) : Temperature decreases with height and due to thin air, places … incentive\\u0027s ihWebState of Andhra Pradesh v. P. Sagar, [1968] 3 S.C.R. 595 and R. Chitralekha & Anr. v. State of Mysore. [1964] 6 S.C.R. 368 referred to. 238 (iii) The Jammu & Kashmir Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Reservation Rules) 1970 were defective and incapable of being given effect to for the following reasons (a) Several of the occupations ... incentive\\u0027s iiWebApr 24, 2024 · Chitralekha v. State of Mysore, AIR 1964 SC 1823 : (1964) 6 13 SCR 368] , the same issue was again considered. It was observed that if the impact of the State law is heavy or devastating as to wipe out or abridge the Central field, it may be struck down. In State of T.N. v. Adhiyaman Educational & Research Institute [State of T.N. v. ina garten recipes roast chickenWebJan 12, 2024 · In ‘R Chitralekha Vs. State of Mysore’, the Supreme Court upheld the economic basis of reservations adopted by erstwhile Mysore government. Moreover the court has time and again problematised ... incentive\\u0027s ioWebApr 24, 2014 · 162 says that the executive power of the State is co-extensive with the power of the legislature to legislate and 409 this Court has held in Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur & Ors. v. The State of Punjab (1) that the power of the State is not confined to matters over which legislation his already been passed. incentive\\u0027s ifWebLJ 934 2 Mumbai & Ors6, Charushila v State of Maharashtra,7 Shantabai Laxman Doiphode v State of Maharashtra 8) and Uttarakhand High Court (in Uttarakhand Subordinate Service Selection Commission v Ranjita Rana 9) - termed as “the first view” in Lalit, J’s judgment, is the correct one, and should be endorsed, and that the view expressed ... incentive\\u0027s ipWebBalaji V. State of Mysore and Chitralekha V. State of Mysore took a rigid stand in refusing to accept caste as a factor of backwardness, treating social backwardness as. a result of … ina garten recipes spaghetti and meatballs